东晋大一统规制下的关系性权力及其逆向操纵——以东晋门阀政治的内向性及慕容氏的运作策略为中心  

Relational Power and Its Reverse Manipulation under the Unified Regulation of the Eastern Jin Dynasty——Centered on the Introversion of the Aristocrat Politics and the Murong's Operation Strategy in the Eastern Jin Dynasty

作　　者：李磊[1] LI Lei(School of History, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学历史学系,上海200241

出　　处：《内蒙古社会科学》2022年第2期59-67,共9页Inner Mongolia Social Sciences

基　　金：上海市浦江人才计划项目“中华认同与南北朝时代的国家建构”(编号:14PJC030)。

摘　　要：东晋虽偏安江左,但以大一统为规制。慕容氏的政权建构充分证明了东晋在大一统规制下所拥有的关系性权力。无论是其将军府、平州刺史(牧)府,还是燕王国,均有赖于东晋的“器与名”。然而,东晋的关系性权力因门阀政治的内向性而未能得到充分运用。当慕容氏利用门阀政治的结构性矛盾逆向运作关系性权力以达成自身目的后,其对东晋的依赖性便逐步降低。慕容儁称帝不仅终结了与东晋的权力关系,而且成为东晋正朔的直接挑战者。Although the Eastern Jin dynasty was located in the south,it was regulated by great unification.The Murong's regime construction proved the relational power possessed by the Eastern Jin dynasty,which was based on the unified regulation.Whether it was the general's military establishment,the government of Pingzhou,or the kingdom of Yan,it all depended on the instrument and name of the Eastern Jin dynasty.However,the relational power obtained by the Eastern Jin dynasty was not fully used because of the introversion of the aristocrat politics.The Murong's dependence on the Eastern Jin dynasty gradually decreased when they used the structural contradiction of the aristocrat politics and the reverse operation of relational power to achieve his own purpose.The Murong Jun's claim to the emperor not only ended this relational power of the Eastern Jin dynasty,but also became a direct challenger to the Eastern Jin dynasty.

关 键 词：东晋 慕容氏 大一统 门阀政治 

分 类 号：K237.2[历史地理—历史学]