检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林宇 LIN Yu(Fujian Provincial Investigation, Design & Research Institute of Water Conservancy & Hydropower Co., Ltd., Fuzhou 350001, China;Fujian Key Laboratory of Hydrodynamics and Water Engineering, Fuzhou 350000, China)
机构地区:[1]福建省水利水电勘测设计研究院有限公司,福州350001 [2]福建省水动力与水工程重点实验室,福州350000
出 处:《广东水利水电》2022年第3期32-35,40,共5页Guangdong Water Resources and Hydropower
摘 要:水口水库作为河道型水库,其库岸范围较大,库区沿岸的地质灾害频繁出现,亟待对重点段落的库岸进行切实有效的防护。通过对水口库区黄田镇双坑村库岸防护工程进行剖析,从稳定性、经济性、适应性及生态性等方面综合对比分析了抗滑桩及抛石固脚压坡方案,重点对比了两种方案的施工特性的优缺点,经比选,推荐采用抛石固脚压坡防护方案。As a river type reservoir,Shuikou reservoir has a large reservoir bank and frequent geological disasters along the reservoir bank.It is urgent to effectively protect the reservoir bank in key sections.By analyzing the reservoir bank protection project of Shuangkeng village,Huangtian town,Shuikou reservoir area,this paper comprehensively compared and analyzed the anti slide pile and riprap foot and slope reinforcement scheme from the aspects of stability,economy,adaptability and ecology,and focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of the construction characteristics of the two schemes.After comparison,the riprap foot and slope reinforcement scheme was recommended.
分 类 号:TV697.22[水利工程—水利水电工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49