西方语境下的男性研究--源起、谱系与显隐  

Men's Studies in the Western Context:Origin, Genealogy, Implicitness and Explicitness

作　　者：张源 ZHANG Yuan

机构地区：[1]中华女子学院(全国妇联干部培训学院)国际教育学院,100101

出　　处：《中华女子学院学报》2022年第2期83-90,共8页Journal of China Women＇s University

摘　　要：与“女性研究”(Women’s studies)形成对比,学界对于“男性研究”(Men’s studies)的引介和推动起步相对较晚,涵盖面比较集中。通过揭示西方语境下男性与男性特质研究的发展及其背后的社会权力关系,做出谱系学视角的梳理、分析和反思,可以发现,男性和男性特质研究存在着隐性和显性的不同形态。在性别极不平等的前工业社会,男性的性别被“合理化”地隐形了;而现代意义上的男性研究是一种显性的男性研究,把男人作为男性放在研究对象的位置上,从社会性别的角度用专业的、科学的研究方法进行分析。当代社会中隐性与显性的男性研究及其知识生产、授权所带来的权力和统治关系仍然并存且相互博弈。每个性别群体都应参与个体的自我赋权和群体的性别平等事业,并从中切实地受惠受益。In contrast to"Women's Studies",the introduction and promotion of"Men's Studies"started relatively late,and the coverage has been relatively limited.Through revealing,sorting out,analyzing and reflecting from the perspective of genealogy on the development of men and masculinity studies as well as the social power relations latent behind in the Western context,it can be found that men and masculinity studies have distinct forms:in the pre-industrial society with extremely gender inequality,men's sex was"legitimately"rendered implicit,whereas men's studies in the modern sense is explicit,positioning men as study subject and analyzing in light of gender by means of professional and scientific approaches.The article argues that in contemporary society,the relations of power and domination brought about by implicit and explicit men's studies as well as its knowledge production and empowerment still coexist and compete against each other.

关 键 词：男性研究 男性特质 社会性别 谱系学 性别平等 

分 类 号：C913.68[经济管理]