检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张海燕[1] 郑前丽 ZHANG Haiyan;ZHENG Qianli(Faculty of Law, Central South University,Changsha 4100012, China)
出 处:《河南科技学院学报(社会科学版)》2022年第3期45-56,共12页Journal of Henan Institute of Science and Technology
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“CPTPP知识产权执法规则与中国应对研究”(16BFX205),主持人:张海燕。
摘 要:CPTPP知识产权超TRIPS边境措施保护对象扩大、适用环节增加、启动门槛降低、侵权货物处置措施趋严,但其缺乏相应的限制和保障性规定,系统制衡性条款不足。CPTPP超TRIPS边境措施用语模糊可能阻碍合法贸易,加大发展中国家执法负担及成本,对接超TRIPS规则存在压力,但可以对其进行“良性忽视”。中国应改革知识产权边境措施规则,推进执法严格化和便利化,同时可通过对CPTPP超TRIPS边境措施进行和谐解释,达到“选择性适应”。TRIPS-plus intellectual property border measures of CPTPP have expanded the protection objects,increased the applicable links,lowered the starting threshold,and tightened the measures for the disposal of infringing goods,but it lacks corresponding restrictions and safeguards and systematic checks and balances.Ambiguous terms of border measures beyond TRIPS may hinder legitimate trade,increase the burden and cost of law enforcement in developing countries,and put pressure on the rules beyond TRIPS,but it can be"benign ignored".China should reform the rules of border measures of intellectual property rights,promote the strictness and convenience of law enforcement,and at the same time,achieve"selective adaptation"by harmoniously explaining the border measures of CPTPP over TRIPS.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249