检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭雪兰[1] 王振凯 余航菱 安悦 蒋凌霄 罗家欣 任辉[1] TAN Xue-lan;WANG Zhen-kai;YU Hang-ling;AN Yue;JIANG Ling-xiao;LUO Jia-xin;REN Hui(College of Resources Environment,Hunan Agricultural University,Changsha 410128,China)
出 处:《自然资源学报》2022年第2期396-407,共12页Journal of Natural Resources
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(41971219,41601097);湖南省自然科学基金项目(2020JJ4372);湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(18ZDB015)。
摘 要:以新晃侗族自治县(以下称"新晃县")84个出列村农户为研究对象,从基础设施、教育医疗、收入状况、产业发展四个方面构建脱贫成效指标体系,对2019年新晃县出列村农户脱贫成效的空间格局、脱贫类型划分与路径进行研究。结果表明:(1)新晃县出列村农户脱贫成效呈现出明显的空间分异特征,基础设施脱贫成效平均得分为2.53,整体呈"北高南低"的态势;教育医疗脱贫成效平均得分为2.65,呈现出"东南高、西北低"的空间分布格局;收入脱贫成效平均得分为2.48,呈高、中、低得分区域交替分布态势;产业脱贫成效平均得分为4.23,但差异明显,仅东部、南部少数村域得分较高。(2)新晃县出列村农户脱贫类型可分为单因素主导脱贫型、双因素驱动脱贫型、多因素综合脱贫型三个大类和F因素主导型、F-E因素驱动型、P-E-I因素综合型等13个小类,同时针对不同脱贫类型提出巩固脱贫成效的策略与路径。Taking farmers in 84 villages in Xinhuang Dong autonomous county as examples,which were removed from the poverty list, we construct an evaluation system of rural households’ poverty alleviation in Xinhuang county from four aspects, including infrastructure,education and medical care, farmers’ income and industrial development, and studies the spatial pattern, types and optimization path of poverty elimination effects in the study area in 2019.Results show that:(1) There are obvious spatial differences of the farmer’s poverty elimination effects: the average score of the effectiveness of infrastructure poverty alleviation was 2.53,characterized by "higher in the north, but lower in the south";the average score of poverty alleviation in education and medical care was 2.65, showing a spatial pattern of "higher in the southeast, while lower in the northwest";the average score of income poverty alleviation effect was 2.48, showing an alternating distribution of high, medium and low scores;the average score of industrial poverty alleviation effect was 4.23, with only a few villages with higher scores in the eastern and southern parts.(2) Three types of poverty alleviation were identified,namely, single factor leading poverty elimination, double-factor driven poverty elimination,multi-factor comprehensive poverty elimination, and they were divided into 13 subtypes including F factor leading poverty elimination, F-E factor driven poverty elimination, P-E-I comprehensive poverty elimination. In addition, effective strategies and paths for different types of poverty elimination were proposed to consolidate poverty eradication achievements.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.192.220