鞋靴主观舒适性评价方法研究进展  

Research Progress on Subjective Comfort Evaluation Methods of Footwear

作　　者：汤运启 郭新宇 王勇[2] 邹灵秋 李灵君 邹利民[3] TANG Yunqi;GUO Xinyu;WANG Yong;ZOU Lingqiu;LI Lingjun;ZOU Limin(College of Art and Design,Shaanxi University of Science and Technology,Xi’an 710021,China;Department of Physical Education,Liaocheng University,Liaocheng 252059,China;College of Physical Educatotion,Jinggangshan University,Ji’an 343009,China)

机构地区：[1]陕西科技大学设计与艺术学院,陕西西安710021 [2]聊城大学体育学院,山东聊城252000 [3]井冈山大学体育学院,江西吉安343009

出　　处：《皮革科学与工程》2022年第2期47-53,共7页Leather Science and Engineering

基　　金：陕西省教育厅重点科研计划项目(21JT002);江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目(TY20111);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(21YJAZH092);山东省研究生教育教学改革研究项目(SDYJG21196)。

摘　　要：在鞋靴穿用过程中,舒适性是一个重要的评价方面,评价方法通常分为主观评价法和客观评价法。目前,还未有研究对常用的主观舒适性评价方法进行系统的综述分析。本文基于知网、万方、维普等中文数据库和Web of Science、PubMed、Science Direct等英文数据库,对文献中有关主观舒适性评价方法和评价内容进行总结与回顾,对现有研究中常用的主观舒适性评价方法的优缺点进行深入分析,为建立系统的鞋靴主观舒适性评价体系和制定鞋靴舒适性评价标准提供借鉴和参考。In the process of wearing shoes and boots,comfortableness is very important in shoes evaluation.In addition,they are usually divided into two methods which are subjective and objective.To our knowledge,there is no research to systematically review and analyze the subjective comfort evaluation methods which are commonly used in the literature.In this study,we searched literatures from Chinese databases such as CNKI,Wanfang,and VIP,and English databases such as Web of Science,PubMed,Sciencedirect,etc.,and then summarized the evaluation methods and the content of subjective comfort evaluation methods.An in-depth analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the comfort evaluation method provides a reference or establishing a systematic subjective comfort evaluation system of footwear and formulating footwear comfort evaluation standards.

关 键 词：鞋 舒适性 主观评价 视觉模拟量表 合脚性 

分 类 号：TS943.1[轻工技术与工程—服装设计与工程]