从刑法歉抑到个人自治:贺建奎案与人类种系基因修饰的法律规制  

From Modesty of Criminal Law to Personal Autonomy:On He Jiankui Case and the Legal Regulation of Human Germline Genetic Modification

作　　者：唐伟华[1,2] TANG Wei-hua

机构地区：[1]青岛大学法学院,山东青岛266071 [2]青岛大学科学伦理与法治研究中心,山东青岛266071

出　　处：《青海民族研究》2021年第4期46-52,共7页Qinghai Journal of Ethnology

基　　金：自然科学基金软课题研究项目“自然科学基金科学理论法律体系构建研究”(批准号:L16Z4014)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：贺建奎案判决中"非法行医罪"的定性值得商榷。刑事问责及人类种系修饰禁令的刑法化,无助于缓解科研人员的责任风险,也无助于兼顾特定患者群体的健康诉求,缓解其所面临的权利困境。审慎监管并不意味着简单化地一禁了之。根据技术进展实施差异性立法及监管或是一种更加合理的态度和策略,在这方面,英国线粒体捐赠立法举措和监管策略,可以提供有益的启示。The determination of the"crime of illegal medical practice"in the He Jiankui case is debatable.On this issue,the criminal accountability and the criminalization of human germline modification prohibitions will not help alleviate the liability risks of researchers,nor do they help to respond to the health demands of specific patient groups and alleviate their rights dilemmas.The prudential supervision of the application of germline genetic modification technologies does not mean simply banning them.It is a more reasonable attitude and strategy to promote differentiated legislation and supervision based on technological progress.In this regard,the British mitochondrial donation legislation and supervision strategies can provide useful enlightenments.

关 键 词：贺建奎案 人类种系基因修饰 非法行医罪 个人自治 刑法歉抑 

分 类 号：C95[社会学—民族学]