检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:季虹 JI Hong(School of Law and Public Affairs,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210044,China)
机构地区:[1]南京信息工程大学法政学院,江苏南京210044
出 处:《河北北方学院学报(社会科学版)》2022年第1期49-54,共6页Journal of Hebei North University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:收养制度作为《民法典》中身份法的重要组成部分,内含浓厚的伦理性。中国现行收养制度及其实践中存在法律标准限制性过强、供需失衡和隐私保障制度缺失等问题,导致法律规范与实践偏离,进而滋生了民间送养和收养行为,也使合法收养面临现实困境。为缓解法律规范与现实生活之间的冲突,以“送养方”为研究视角,通过对收养制度的工具价值、实质标准、形式标准以及监督机制的调试与修正推动收养制度的完善,以此扩大合法收养的生存空间。The adoption system,as an important part of the identity law in the Civil Code,contains strong ethics.In the current adoption system and its practice,there are such problems as the too restrictive legal standards,the imbalance between supply and demand,the lack of privacy protection system,etc.,leading to the deviation between legal norms and practice,precipitating folk placement and adoption,and putting legal adoption in a dilemma.In order to buffer the conflict between legal norms and practice and protect legal adoption,from the perspective of the person who places a child for adoption,it is suggested that the adoption system be improved by regulating the instrumental value,the substantive standards,the formal standards,and the supervision mechanism of the adoption system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.127