检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张艳丽[1] Zhang Yanli
机构地区:[1]山东理工大学《管子学刊》编辑部
出 处:《孙子研究》2021年第5期38-44,共7页Sunzi Studies
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“稷下学派文献整理与数据库建设研究”成果,课题号:19JZD011。
摘 要:孙武及其著作《孙子兵法》在中国历史上影响深远,历代学者对其多有褒扬和高度评价。但是,宋代苏洵所作《孙武》一文,明确指责孙武在辅佐吴国攻楚时犯有“三失”的错误,不能践行自身在《孙子兵法》中提出的作战原则,军事实践与兵学理论不相符合。受此影响,宋代一些学者对孙武与《孙子兵法》评价不高。至清代,魏源、施补华等学者则针对苏洵的观点进行了辩驳,认为应客观、辩证地评价孙武及其兵学理论的时代背景和历史价值,从而为当代社会正确定位孙武兵学的作用提供了指导和借鉴。Sun Wu and his book The Art of War has a profound influence in Chinese history.However,in the article Sun Wu written by Su Xun in the Song Dynasty,Su Xun clearly accused Sun Wu of making the“three losses”error when assisting the State of Wu to attack the State of Chu.Sun Wu was unable to practice his own combat principles in The Art of War.So his military practice and military theory do not match.Affected by this,some scholars in the Song Dynasty did not have a high evaluation of Sun Wu and The Art of War.In the Qing Dynasty,scholars such as Wei Yuan and Shi Buhua argued against Su Xun”s point of view,and believed that the background and historical value of Sun Wu and his military theory should be evaluated objectively and dialectically,so as to provide guidance for the correct positioning of Sun Wu”s military theory in contemporary society.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.26