族群联邦制与族群冲突管理:议题转变与理论发展  

Ethnofederalism and Ethnic Conflict Management:Agenda Transformations and Theoretical Development

作　　者：刘颜俊 邢昌新 Liu Yanjun;Xing Changxin

机构地区：[1]北京大学政府管理学院、国家治理研究院,100871 [2]北京大学政府管理学院,100871

出　　处：《国际政治研究》2021年第6期56-82,6,7,共29页The Journal of International Studies

基　　金：北京大学公共治理研究所一般课题(项目编号:YBXM202105)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：族群联邦制是一种处理国家结构与族群政治问题的制度设计,理论上兼有族群冲突缓解与激化两种相反的效果,实践中正反面案例均存在。从相对静态的视角来看,历史文化、国际力量、经济、族群的政治地理等结构性的情境条件导致族群联邦制在一些国家成功而在另一些国家失败。从过程导向视角来看,与族群联邦制相作用的具体政治实践过程及其他相关联的政治制度体系的运行也会影响族群联邦制的表现。族群联邦制同时强调自治与共治。各行为体如何在特定的结构性情境条件下,以何种策略展开互动实践来动员和运用认同与资源,决定了族群联邦制在管理族群冲突中的成败。Ethnofederalism is an institutional arrangement of a state designed to organize and manage ethnic politics.Depending on their theorizing strategies and empirical evidence,scholars have come to different conclusions about the efficacy of ethnofederalism as an institution.While some argue that ethnofederalism reduces conflict,others contend that ethnofederalism increases conflict.This contradiction in scholarly findings calls for careful contextualization in analyses.Scholars have utilized a range of contextual factors,history and culture,international forces,economics,and political geography,and have analyzed their impact on ethnofederalism’s success or failure.Built upon recent scholarly research,this article suggests that the dynamics of unfolding political processes and the configurative system of multiple power-sharing institutions must be considered as important macro contextual factors.How they interact with ethnofederalism will shape the institutional performance of ethnofederalism.

关 键 词：世界政治 族群联邦制 族群冲突管理 分离主义 情境化 权力分享 族群政治 

分 类 号：D032[政治法律—政治学]