检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王勇 WANG Yong(Law School,Hebei University,Baoding,Hebei 071000,China)
出 处:《石家庄学院学报》2022年第2期59-63,90,共6页Journal of Shijiazhuang University
基 金:河北省教育厅青年基金项目“人民陪审制改革路径的检视与改进”(SQ201003)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:人民陪审制改革实施中暴露出陪审员选任呈泛民主化、事实问题与法律问题区分模糊、制度功能发生异化以及陪审员参审欠缺程序保障的问题。对这些实践难题应围绕制度改革的价值导向,经由优化陪审员选任程序、明确事实问题与法律问题区分规则、合理厘定陪审案件适用范围以及完善人民陪审员参审程序保障机制的路径来消解。The implementation of the reform of the people’s jury system has exposed that the selection and appointment of jurors is pan-democratic, the distinction between factual issues and legal issues is blurred,institutional functions are alienated, and jurors’ participation in trials lacks procedural guarantees. These practical problems should be solved by optimizing the selection procedure of jurors, clarifying the rules for distinguishing between factual issues and legal issues, reasonably determining the scope of application of jury cases and perfecting the guarantee mechanism of the procedure for people’s jurors to participate in the trial.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38