检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:万昊 张福俊[2] 吕千千 WAN Hao;ZHANG Fujun;LV Qianqian(Library of Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266590;Development Planning Office,Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266590;Document Information Center,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190)
机构地区:[1]山东科技大学图书馆,青岛266590 [2]山东科技大学发展规划处,青岛266590 [3]中国科学院文献情报中心,北京100190
出 处:《农业图书情报学报》2022年第2期88-101,共14页Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture
基 金:山东科技大学人才引进科研启动基金项目“同行评议与计量评价在科研评价中应用比较研究”(2017RCJJ094);国家林业局948计划项目“引进林业产业技术评估、集成与创新”(2012-4-25-2)。
摘 要:[目的/意义]本文以项目评审为例探索专家知识为基础的同行评议判断的有效性。[方法/过程]本文采用数据包络分析测度项目的研发效率,评价模型为经超效率修正的CCR模型,并将该效率指标作为同行评议有效性的验证标准。数据源为国家林业局实施完毕的126项“948”项目,涵盖13项投入与产出评价指标。[结果/结论]实验发现:项目同行评议结果与实际研发效率(DEA超效率)之间呈现适度的正相关性,Spearman相关系数ρ=0.250 (Sig.<0.01)。主观评审犯Ⅰ类错误与Ⅱ类错误的比重分别为17.5%与18.2%,有效同行评议决策比重占64.3%。证实同行评议的确存在一定的系统误差但不可避免。[Purpose/Significance]This article uses some projects’ peer review results as an example to explore the effectiveness of peer review based on expert knowledge. [Method/Process]It uses data envelopment analysis to measure the R&D efficiency of the projects.The evaluation model is a CCR model modified by super-efficiency, and the efficiency index is used as a verification standard for the effectiveness of peer review results. The data source is 126 "948 projects" implemented by the State Forestry Administration, covering 13 input and output evaluation indicators. [Results/Conclusions]The experiment found that there was a moderate positive correlation between the project peer review results and the actual R&D efficiency(DEA super efficiency), and the Spearman correlation coefficient ρ=0.250(Sig.<0.01). The percentages of type I errors and type II errors made by subjective review were 17.5% and 18.2%, respectively,and effective peer review decisions accounted for 64.3%. It is confirmed that there are certain systematic errors in peer review, but they are inevitable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222