一流学科建设背景下浙江高校人文社科学科评估——基于学术论文视角  

Evaluation of Humanities and Social Sciences in Zhejiang Colleges and Universities Under the Background of First-class Discipline Construction

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:郑凌燕[1] 蒋其岑 ZHENG Lingyan;JIANG Qicen(Ningbo University,Ningbo Zhejiang 315211)

机构地区:[1]宁波大学,浙江宁波315211

出  处:《浙江万里学院学报》2022年第2期92-101,共10页Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University

基  金:浙江省教科规划项目课题(2020SCG083)。

摘  要:文章采用文献计量法,对2011-2019年浙江高校论文被收录量、基金项目量、基金论文量进行分析,评估浙江各高校人文社会科学学科发展现状。结果表明:浙江大学是浙江人文社科发展的支柱力量,浙江工商大学、浙江财经大学、宁波大学人文社科研究能力与研究水平位居前列,浙江工商大学、浙江财经大学的经济学与管理学优势明显,宁波大学教育学科研水平较高。社会科学各科发展优势明显,人文各科发展势头较弱,其中,企业管理学、高等教育学、数量经济学、中国现当代文学等为浙江人文社科优势学科。In the context of the construction of world-class disciplines, the bibliometric method was used to analyze the number of papers, funded projects, and funded papers in Zhejiang colleges and universities from 2011 to 2019, and evaluate the development status of humanities and social sciences in Zhejiang universities. The results showed that Zhejiang University is the backbone of the development of humanities and social sciences in Zhejiang universities. Zhejiang Gongshang University, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, and Ningbo University ranked in the forefront of humanities and social science research capabilities and research levels. Zhejiang Gongshang University and Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics had an academic advantage in economics and management, and Ningbo University had a high level of pedagogy research. The development of social sciences had obvious advantages, and the development momentum of humanities was relatively weak. Among them, business management, higher education, quantitative economics, and modern and contemporary Chinese literature were the dominant disciplines of humanities and social sciences in Zhejiang.

关 键 词:人文社科 学科评估 文献计量法 

分 类 号:G64[文化科学—高等教育学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象