美国大科技公司反垄断及其权力规制  

Antitrust and Power Regulation of Large American Technology Companies

作　　者：丁玮[1] 於兴中[2] Ding Wei;Yu Xingzhong

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨工程大学人文社会科学学院 [2]康奈尔大学法学院

出　　处：《中国政法大学学报》2022年第1期149-160,共12页Journal Of CUPL

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“数字社会私权力宪法规制研究”(项目批准号:21BFX043)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：信息社会背景下大科技公司正迅速成为美国的权力参与者。美国政府新一轮的反垄断受到法律变革、政府监管和知识界参与等因素的影响,传统的反垄断法已经难以适应科技和数字经济快速发展的现实。经济权力。信息权力、数据权力、算法权力等是私权力崛起的核心问题。脸书监督委员会的建立,使脸书完成了国家体系之外的一套独立的立法、行政和司法的超国家效力范围的闭环运行系统。在数字时代,科技公司在数字社会中的法律地位需要被重新定义,法律界势必要迎接这一变革并为此做好法律理论和政策上的准备。大科技公司的崛起是数字社会面临的最重大的社会变革。反垄断法并不能解决私权力带来的挑战。需要在法哲学和法律思想、宪法秩序、实证研究和立法改革等方面推动综合法律改革。Under the background of information society,big technology companies are rapidly becoming power participants in the United States,and the new round of anti-monopoly campaign by the US government rests on legal changes,government regulation and the participation of the intellectual community.Traditional anti-trust law has been difficult to adapt to the reality of rapid development of science and technology and digital economy.Besides economic power,information power,data power and algorithmic power are the core issues of the rise of private power.The establishment of the Facebook Oversight Committee enables Facebook to complete a closed loop of operation system,with independent legislative,administrative and judicial functions beyond the national jurisdiction.In the digital era,the legal status of technology companies in the digital society needs to be redefined,and the legal community is bound to meet this change and prepare for it in legal theory and policy.The rise of big tech is the most significant social change facing the digital society.Antitrust laws do not address the challenges of private power.It needs comprehensive reforms in legal philosophy and legal thought,constitutional order,empirical research,and legislative reform.

关 键 词：反垄断 大科技公司 私权力 法律改革 

分 类 号：D971.2[政治法律—法学]