5E护理干预联合人文关怀对脑卒中恢复期患者的影响分析  

Effects of 5E Nursing Intervention Combined with Humanistic Care on Convalescent Patients with Cerebral Apoplexy

作　　者：黄悦 HUANG Yue(Liaoyang Liaohua Hospital,Liaoyang 111003,China)

机构地区：[1]辽宁省辽阳辽化医院,辽宁辽阳111003

出　　处：《中国医药指南》2022年第7期141-143,147,共4页Guide of China Medicine

摘　　要：目的探究在对脑卒中恢复期患者实施护理干预期间采用5E护理干预+人文关怀联合护理措施的重要性,及其所带来的影响。方法本项研究选取的研究对象主要为2019年1月至2021年10月于我院接受诊治和康复护理的脑卒中患者,共计114例。在开展研究之前,依据随机数字表法将患者按照住院编号随机均分成两组。其中参考组57例患者在康复护理期间接受常规护理;干预组57例在康复护理期间接受5E护理干预+人文关怀联合护理。对两组患者经不同措施干预前后的生活质量、肢体运动功能及神经功能缺损进行评估及对比。结果在实施干预前,参考组生活质量、肢体运动功能及神经功能缺损评分分别为(15.13±3.08)分、(50.35±5.19)分、(50.16±4.31)分,干预组为(15.08±3.02)分、(50.38±5.06)分、(51.73±4.28)分,对比结果无显著性差异(t=1.271、0.856、1.093,P>0.05);实施干预后,参考组生活质量、肢体运动功能及神经功能缺损评分分别为(12.09±2.75)分、(67.23±6.02)分、(62.43±4.21)分,干预组为(10.35±2.53)分、(79.78±5.46)分、(69.26±4.13)分,对比结果有显著性差异(t=3.257、6.092、5.314,P<0.05)。在实施干预前,参考组SAS、SDS评分分别为(60.13±7.26)分、(62.23±8.46)分,干预组为(59.54±8.02)分、(63.02±7.46)分,对比结果无显著性差异(t=0.412、0.529,P>0.05);实施干预后,参考组SAS、SDS评分分别为(42.11±5.03)分、(41.03±4.98)分,干预组为(35.46±5.25)分、(35.02±6.13)分,对比结果有显著性差异(t=6.905、5.745,P<0.05)。结论脑卒中恢复期患者联合应用5E护理干预及人文关怀可加快患者身体功能恢复,并提升生活质量。Objective To explore the importance of 5E nursing intervention+humanistic care combined nursing measures during the implementation of nursing intervention for patients with cerebral apoplexy convalescence,as well as its impact.Methods The subjects of this study were 114 stroke patients who received diagnosis,treatment and rehabilitation nursing in our hospital from January 2019 to October 2021.Before the study,the patients were randomly divided into two groups according to their hospitalization numbers by random number table method.Among them,57 patients in the reference group received routine care during rehabilitation care;57 patients in the intervention group also received 5E nursing intervention+humanistic care during rehabilitation nursing.The quality of life,limb motor function and neurological function defects of the two groups were evaluated and compared before and after intervention with different measures.Results Before intervention,the scores of quality of life,motor function and neurological impairment in the reference group were(15.13±3.08)points,(50.35±5.19)points,(50.16±4.31)points,respectively.Intervention group were(15.08±3.02)points,(50.38±5.06)points,(51.73±4.28)points,there was no difference in comparison results(t=1.271,0.856,1.093,P>0.05).After intervention,the scores of quality of life,motor function and neurological impairment in the reference group were(12.09±2.75)points,(67.23±6.02)points,(62.43±4.21)points,and those in the study group were(10.35±2.53)points,(79.78±5.46)points,(69.26±4.13)points,there was no significant difference in the comparison results(t=3.257,6.092,5.314,P<0.05).Before the intervention,the SAS and SDS scores of the reference group were(60.13±7.26)and(62.23±8.46)respectively,and those of the intervention group were(59.54±8.02)and(63.02±7.46).There was no difference in the comparison results(t=0.412,0.529,P>0.05).After the intervention,the SAS and SDS scores of the reference group were(42.11±5.03)and(41.03±4.98)respectively,and those of the intervent

关 键 词：5E护理干预 人文关怀 脑卒中恢复期 遵医行为 神经功能缺损 肢体运动功能 生活质量 

分 类 号：R473.74[医药卫生—护理学]