实体与程序双重视角下的动态质押适法论  

On the Law Suitability of Dynamic Pledge from the Perspectives of Entity and Procedure

作　　者：毕胜 李凤伟 BI Sheng;LI Feng-wei(Shandong University of Political Science and Law,Jinan 250014,China;Shandong Shunxiang Lawyer Office,Jinan 250014,China)

机构地区：[1]山东政法学院,济南250014 [2]山东舜翔律师事务所,济南250014

出　　处：《山东青年政治学院学报》2022年第2期59-65,共7页Journal of Shandong Youth University of Political Science

基　　金：山东政法学院一般科研项目“实体与程序双重维度下的动态质押规制问题研究”(2021Q05B)。

摘　　要：最符合动态质押理论构造的公示方法是占有,这也是动态质押逻辑构成的基础。在实体视角中,动态质押具有非典型担保属性,动产之上设立动态质权并未违反物权客体特定原则。通过对《民法典》第429条进行扩大解释,结合《民法典担保制度司法解释》第55条,可以为共同占有方式设立质权寻找适法的解释路径。在程序视角中,民事纠纷一次性解决理念为动态质押纠纷的合并审理提供了适法性解释的空间,若动态质押纠纷中监管合同纠纷与担保合同纠纷基于同一事实或两个事实之间存在牵连关系,经当事人提出,可以进行合并审理。The most suitable publicity method for dynamic pledge theory is possession,which is also the foundation of dynamic pledge logic.From the perspective of entity,dynamic pledge has atypical guarantee property.The establishment of dynamic pledge on movable property does not violate the principle of specific object of real right.By expanding the interpretation of Article 429 of the Civil Code and combining with Article 55 of Judicial Interpretation of Guarantee System of the Civil Code,this paper tries to find an appropriate interpretation path for the establishment of pledge by joint possession.From the perspective of procedure,the concept of one-time settlement of civil disputes provides a space for legal interpretation for the combined trial of dynamic pledge disputes.If the supervision contract dispute and the guarantee contract dispute in dynamic pledge disputes are based on the same fact or there is an implicated relationship between two facts,the combined trial can be conducted upon the proposal of the parties.

关 键 词：动态质押 公示方法 合法性解释 合并审理 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]