新恢复性司法理念在环境犯罪中的运用  

The Application of New Definition of Restorative Justice in Environmental Crimes

作　　者：刘旻雯 LIU Minwen(Public Administration College,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu,S:chuan,610000,China)

机构地区：[1]西南交通大学公共管理学院法学系,四川成都610000

出　　处：《乐山师范学院学报》2022年第2期89-95,共7页Journal of Leshan Normal University

摘　　要：生态修复近年来成为了环境犯罪治理的改革方向。具体恢复性措施与恢复性司法的特点相合,因而出现了直接将恢复性司法作为具体恢复性措施理论基础运用的情况。然而,传统恢复性司法作为一种典型的域外司法模式,在适用条件、适用类型、适用方式上,与我国国情及环境犯罪有诸多不适配之处,缺乏应有的规范作用与解释力。本文基于恢复性司法的通说定义,对其进行“本土化”改造,针对环境修复目的,构建了新的恢复性司法理念,并分析其对具体恢复性措施的理论指导意义,并探究在环境刑事案件中具体运用该新理念,以完善环境刑事案件中的生态修复责任体系。In recent years,ecological remediation has become the reform direction of environmental crime containment.Because its purpose is consistent with the characteristics of restorative justice,such judicial mode is directly applied as the theoretical basis of specific restorative measures under some circumstances.As a typical pattern of extraterritorial jurisdiction,the traditional restorative justice is incompatible with China’s national conditions and environmental crimes in terms of applicable conditions,types,and modes.Therefore,it will be ‘unacclimatized’ to directly take this mode as the theoretical basis of specific restorative measures in criminal cases.This paper first elaborates the general definition of restorative justice,then “localizes” this definition.In addition,the paper also sorts out the theoretical significance of the new restorative justice to specific restorative measures and explores how to apply them in environmental criminal cases.This study helps to optimize the responsibility system of ecological remediation in such criminal cases.

关 键 词：恢复性司法 生态修复 刑事案件 具体恢复性措施 

分 类 号：D911[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]