法律证据事实的逻辑方法探析  

Analysis of Logical Method of Legal Evidence and Facts

作　　者：杜文静 刘海 Wenjing Du;Hai Liu(Wenbo College, East China University of Political Science and Law;School of Statistics and Information, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学文伯书院 [2]上海对外经贸大学统计与信息学院

出　　处：《逻辑学研究》2022年第1期64-81,共18页Studies in Logic

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“刑事证据推理的逻辑模型研究”(19BZX138)。

摘　　要：本文从法律逻辑视角探讨了司法证明中证据与事实之间的证据推理,并提出运用过程的明示化是实现理性证明的重要保证。证据推理的目的是构建案件事实,其过程是多种推理类型的综合运用,但从证据到案件事实的构建,背后的理念是一种最佳解释推论。最佳解释推论是异于演绎推理、归纳推理、类比推理的新型推理模式,它包括构建解释、比较解释、选择解释这三个思维过程。最佳解释推论为法律逻辑学的实践转向提供了新的视野和研究方法,对我国司法改革和司法证明的科学化具有重要的借鉴意义。In this paper,we discuss reasoning with evidence between evidence and facts in judicial proof from the perspective of legal logic and propose the demonstration of its application process are the important guarantee to realize rational proof.The purpose of reasoning with evidence is to construct the facts of a case.The process of eviden-tial reasoning is the comprehensive application of various types of reasoning.From the evidence to the construction of the facts of the case,the idea behind it is inference to the best explanation.The inference of the best explanation is a new mode of reasoning different from deductive reasoning,inductive reasoning and analogical reasoning.It in-cludes three thought processes:constructing explanations,comparing explanations and choosing explanations.The inference of the best explanation provides a new perspective and research method for the practical turn of legal logic and has important reference sig-nificance for judicial reform and the scientific nature of judicial proof in China.

关 键 词：法律逻辑 法律证据与事实 证据推理 最佳解释推论 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]