检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁家豪 王振北 朱洪涛[1,2] 孙德智[1,2] LIANG Jiahao;WANG Zhenbei;ZHU Hongtao;SUN Dezhi(Beijing Key Laboratory for Source Control Technology of Water Pollution,Beijing Forestry University;Engineering Research Center for Water Pollution Source Control and Eco-Remediation,Beijing Forestry University)
机构地区:[1]北京林业大学水体污染源控制技术北京市重点实验 [2]北京林业大学污染水体源控与生态修复技术北京高校工程研究中心
出 处:《环境工程技术学报》2022年第2期390-398,共9页Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology
基 金:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2017ZX07401-004)。
摘 要:针对水污染治理目标的差异化需求,构建了一套水污染治理技术适用性评估方法。评估指标体系既包括反映水污染治理目标的评估指标,又包含技术本身的性能指标;在具体评估中,先采用层次分析法(AHP)对指标体系中每项指标赋权,再采用优劣解距离法(TOPSIS)对备选技术进行综合性能评估,进而筛选出满足水污染治理目标需求的适配性推荐技术。采用该方法对某海绵城市建设和某黑臭水体治理项目进行案例应用研究,考察所构建的技术适用性评估方法是否能够达到预期效果。这2个案例由于治理目标需求不同,构建的技术评估指标体系和评估指标权重不同,导致从同一技术储备库中筛选出的适配性推荐技术并不一致,表明AHP-TOPSIS技术适用性评估方法可以依据水污染治理目标需求的差异性筛选出适配性推荐技术。A set of technology applicability evaluation method was constructed according to the differentiated needs of water pollution treatment goals.In the index system constructed for technology screening and evaluation,the water pollution treatment goals should be decomposed into evaluation indexes,and the performance indexes of the technology itself should be included.Then,Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)was used to assign weight to each index in the index system,and the comprehensive performance of the alternative technologies was evaluated by using Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)method,so as to screen out the adaptive recommended technologies that met the needs of water pollution treatment objectives.This method was applied to the case studies of a sponge city construction and a black and smelly water treatment project,to investigate whether the technical applicability evaluation method constructed in this study could achieve the expected effect.Due to the different governance objectives and needs,the technical evaluation index system and the weight of evaluation index were different in these two case and,as a result,the suitability recommended technologies screened from the same technology library were not consistent.This indicated that the AHP-TOPSIS technology applicability evaluation method could be used to screen the adaptive recommended technologies according to the differences of water pollution governance objectives and needs.
关 键 词:水污染治理 目标需求 技术筛选 AHP-TOPSIS法
分 类 号:X524[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.115.20