检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱健 ZHU Jian
出 处:《经济社会史评论》2022年第1期38-51,127,共15页Economic and Social History Review
摘 要:13世纪英格兰世俗法官在王室法庭中所占比例是一个重要的学术问题。传统观点认为,在13世纪的王室法庭中,大多数法官由神职人员担任。主要原因是,中世纪教会垄断了教育资源,俗人没有受教育的机会,因而没有做法官的资格。然而重新考察王室法官的背景,情况却并非如此。在理查德一世至亨利三世统治时期,世俗法官在王室法庭中占有的比例,平均超过半数。可见世俗身份并不是他们接受教育的障碍。在13世纪,人们有各种可以选择的基础教育资源。他们可以从早先的地方从业经历中获得法律职业教育或训练。The number of secular judges in the royal courts in the 13^(th) century is an important academic issue.The traditional view is that the majority of judges in the 13^(th)-century royal courts were clerics;the main reason is that in the Middle Ages,the church monopolized educational resources,and laymen had no opportunity to receive education,so they were not qualified to be judges.However,this is not the case when re-examining the background of the royal judges.From Richard Ⅰ to Henry Ⅲ,the proportion of secular judges in the royal courts averaged more than half.It can be seen that secular status was not an obstacle to their education.In the 13^(th) century,laymen had various alternative primary educational resources.They could obtain legal professional education or training from their previous local experience.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.232.123