出 处:《中国医药指南》2022年第9期58-61,68,共5页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的研究康复护理对腰椎压缩性骨折患者生活质量的影响。方法对2017年3月至2019年10月来我院进行治疗的54例腰椎压缩性骨折患者随机分为观察组和对照组,平均27例。分别将康复护理和常规护理模式应用在观察组和对照组患者的护理当中,对两组患者经过不同护理后的护理质量进行比较。结果①观察组(26例,占96.30%)经过康复护理后患者的满意度水平明显比经常规护理干预的对照组(20例,占74.07%)更高,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②经过康复护理后观察组患者的并发症发生概率(3例,占11.11%)比经过常规护理后对照组的并发症发生概率(13例,占48.15%)更低,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。③护理前,两组患者在SAS评分、SDS评分、VAS评分、JOA评分等方面未表现出显著性差异(P>0.05),护理后,两组的SAS评分、SDS评分、VAS评分、JOA评分有所改善,但观察组改善较对照组更为显著,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。④护理前,观察组的SF-36生活质量评分和对照组相差不明显(P>0.05),护理后,观察组SF-36生活质量评分明显高于对照组,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。⑤通过康复护理后观察组的整体满意度水平(27例,占100.00%)比经过常规护理的对照组(20例,占74.07%)更高,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对腰椎压缩性骨折患者护理中应用康复护理进行指导对提高其康复效果及改善并发症的影响具有重要意义,还能协助患者改善自己的负面情绪,减轻疼痛,促进腰椎功能的稳定性,使得整体生活质量和满意度均得到提高,值得推荐。Objective To study the effect of rehabilitation nursing on the quality of life of patients with lumbar compression fractures.Methods Fifty-four patients with lumbar spine compression fractures who came to our hospital for treatment from March 2017 to October 2019 were randomly divided into observation group and control group,with an average of 27 cases.Rehabilitation nursing and conventional nursing models were applied to the nursing of the observation group and the control group respectively,and the nursing quality of the two groups of patients after different nursing was compared.Results(1)The satisfaction level of patients in the observation group(26 cases,accounting for 96.30%)after rehabilitation nursing was significantly higher than that in the control group(20 cases,accounting for 74.07%)after routine nursing intervention,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).(2)After rehabilitation nursing,the incidence of complications in the observation group(3 cases,accounting for 11.11%)was lower than that in the control group(13 cases,accounting for 48.15%)after routine care,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).(3)Before nursing,there was no significant difference in SAS score,SDS score,VAS score and JOA score between the two groups of patients(P>0.05).SAS score,SDS score,VAS score and JOA score improved,but the improvement in the observation group was more significant,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).(4)Before nursing,the SF36 quality of life score in the observation group There was no significant difference with the control group(P>0.05).After nursing,the SF-36 quality of life score in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).(5)The observation group after rehabilitation nursing the overall satisfaction level of(27 cases,accounting for 100.00%)was higher than that of the control group(20 cases,accounting for 74.07%)who received routine care,and the difference was s
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...