检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴凤平[1] 李梦珂 邱泽硕 WU Fengping;LI Mengke;QIU Zeshuo(Business School,Hohai University,Nanjing 211100,China)
出 处:《水利经济》2022年第2期51-56,89,共7页Journal of Economics of Water Resources
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71774048);河海大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项(B210207029)。
摘 要:基于我国水权市场特点,研究如何构建水权交易信用体系问题。选择北方地区、南方地区共12个水权交易典型案例,采用QCA即定性比较分析方法,从技术层面、制度层面和文化层面提取影响水权市场信用体系的关键因素,从改进监控技术、完善信息披露制度、明确评价标准、加大奖惩力度、做好文化宣传等方面提出对策建议。How to establish a credit system for the trading of water rights is studied based on the characteristics of market of water rights in China.A total of 12 typical cases of trading of water rights in the northern and southern regions are selected,and the QCA method,a qualitative comparative analysis method,is used to extract the key factors affecting the credit system of the market of water rights from the technical,institutional and cultural levels.Some countermeasures are proposed in terms of improving the monitoring technology,promoting the information disclosure system,clarifying the evaluation criteria,increasing the rewards and penalties,and strengthening the work of cultural propaganda.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.29