明陵石刻造型特征及价值体现  

Value Embodiment of Modeling Features for Judging the Time of Carved Stones on the Emperors’Mausoleums in Ming Dynasty

作　　者：王晔 郑艺鸿 Wang Ye;Zheng Yihong(College of Architecture, Anhui Science and Technology University, Bengbu 233000 China)

机构地区：[1]安徽科技学院建筑学院,安徽蚌埠233000

出　　处：《西安文理学院学报（社会科学版）》2022年第1期65-69,共5页Journal of Xi’an University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目:明代帝陵石刻研究(16BF073);安徽省哲学社会科学规划项目:明中都皇陵乔涧子琉璃官窑出土器物的造物艺术范式研究(AHSKQ2018D70);2021年滁州市第六届社会科学应用对策研究课题:凤阳明代遗址装饰纹样考释与创新性研究(B2021027)。

摘　　要：现有研究中对明代五处帝陵石刻的先后顺序一直没有统一的说法,主要是因为明祖陵石刻的时间存在分歧,且时间差距大,影响到五处石刻的先后关系。由于史料的缺少及记载的不统一,使文献作为标准判断石刻时间的准确性大打折扣。而石刻规制又因为当时统治阶层的主观意愿而更改的可能性极大,因此即便能够从现存石刻实物中推断石刻制度的传承关系,但作为判断石刻先后的标准仍不够确凿,反映出当时雕刻者主观意识形态的石刻造型具体特征却因为能够体现出所处时代的普遍属性而更具有说服力,对石刻所属时间的判断也更具有价值。Existing researches fail to give uniform statement on the sequence of carved stones on 5 emperors’mausoleums in Ming Dynasty.This is mainly because there is the divergence about the time of carved stones on Ancestors’Mausoleums in Ming Dynasty.Besides,the time gap is large,which influences the sequence of carved stones on emperors’mausoleums.Because there is short of historical data and the records are not uniform,the accuracy of the historical data as the standard to judge the time of carved stones has greatly reduced.The possibility that the carved stone regulations changed due to subjective will of the dominance hierarchy is great.Thus,even if the inherent relationship of carved stone system can be inferred from existing entities,the material objects as the standard to judge the carved stones are still inaccurate.The specific features of carved stone modeling reflecting graves;subjective ideology are more convincing,because they can reflect general attribute of the era.Besides,they have more values for judging the time of carved stones.

关 键 词：造型特征 明代帝陵 石刻时间 石刻表现 价值体现 

分 类 号：J323[艺术—美术]