检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张琴 王晓晴 李莉莉[1] ZHANG Qin;WANG Xiao-qing;LI Li-li(School of Economics, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266061, China)
机构地区:[1]青岛大学经济学院,青岛266061
出 处:《青岛大学学报(自然科学版)》2022年第1期112-116,共5页Journal of Qingdao University(Natural Science Edition)
基 金:国家社科基金项目(批准号:2019BTJ028)资助。
摘 要:为了扎实推进乡村振兴,需要通过科学合理的统计监测指标体系判断乡村振兴战略的进展和成效。基于信息熵和TOPSIS模型构建乡村振兴评价体系,包括产业兴旺、生态宜居、乡风文明、治理有效、生活富裕5个一级指标和22个二级指标,评价2018年中国31个省份的乡村振兴发展水平。研究结果表明,不同地区的乡村振兴发展水平存在明显差异,最高和最低的乡村振兴发展指数分别是0.5946(山东省)和0.3196(西藏自治区)。乡村振兴发展水平由高到低依次为东部、中部、西部。另外,全国乡村振兴发展指数的平均值不到0.4489,仅有不超过一半的省份达到了均值,这表明中国乡村振兴的整体发展水平并不理想。Scientific and reasonable statistical monitoring index system is used to judge the progress and effectiveness of Rural Revitalization Strategy.It will help to solidly promote Rural Revitalization.Based on information entropy and TOPSIS model,a Rural Revitalization evaluation system was constructed,including five primary indicators and 22 secondary indicators of industrial prosperity,ecological livability,rural civilization,effective governance and rich life.It was used to evaluate the Rural Revitalization and development level of 31 provinces in China in 2018.The results show that obvious differences exist in Rural Revitalization and development level in different regions.The highest and lowest scores are 0.5946(Shandong Province)and 0.3196(Tibet Autonomous Region)respectively.The development level of Rural Revitalization is eastern,central and western regions from high to low.In addition,the average scores of the national Rural Revitalization and development index is less than 0.4489,and only less than half of the provinces reached the average.It indicates that the overall development level of China's Rural Revitalization is not ideal.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7