2010-2019年中医学类期刊核心总被引频次及核心影响因子与综合评价总分的多元线性回归模型分析  

Analysis of Multiple Linear Regression Model of the Relationship Between the Core Citation Frequency the Core Impact Factor and the Comprehensive Evaluation Score in Traditional Chinese Medicine Journals from 2010 to 2019

作　　者：张丽君[1] 柳树英[1] 赵晓丽[1,2] ZHANG Lijun;LIU Shuying;ZHAO Xiaoli(Gansu Provincial Academy of Chinese Medicine,Lanzhou 730050,China;Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine)

机构地区：[1]甘肃省中医药研究院,甘肃兰州730050 [2]甘肃省中医院

出　　处：《西部中医药》2022年第3期84-90,共7页Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine

摘　　要：目的:通过主要计量指标探究核心总被引频次、核心影响因子与综合评价总分的关系及核心被引频次和核心影响因子对综合评价总分的影响系数。方法:采用开源统计软件Rstudio(版本:1.4.1103)对2010—2019年中医学类期刊核心总被引频次、核心影响因子及综合评价总分进行多元线性回归分析,比较核心总被引频次、核心影响因子对综合评价总分的影响系数。结果:核心总被引频次、核心影响因子与综合评价总分有较强的正相关。其中,核心影响因子对综合评价总分呈显著性影响。讨论:中医学类期刊的提升应注重核心被引频次和核心影响因子,尤其对核心影响因子应给予足够重视。Objective:To investigate the relationship between core citation frequency(CCF),core impact factor(CIF)and comprehensive evaluation score(CES),the impacting coefficients of CCF and CIF on CES using the main measurement indicators.Methods:Using statisitical analysis software Rstudio(version:1.4.1103),multiple linear regression analysis on CCF,CIF,CES of TCM journals between 2010 and 2019 was conducted,to compare annual impacting coefficients of CCF and CIF on CES.Results:CCF and CIF have a strong positive linear relationship with CES.CIF has a significant impact on CES.Conclusion:To improve CES,TCM Journals should enhance their CCF and CIF.Specifically,CIF should be primarily focused.

关 键 词：核心总被引频次 核心影响因子 综合评价总分 多元线性回归分析 中医学类期刊 

分 类 号：R2[医药卫生—中医学]