行政处罚听证程序的立法缺陷与法治化回应--以《行政处罚法(修订草案)》为中心  

Legislative Defects and Legal Response of Administrative Penalty Hearing Procedure--Based on the Administrative Punishment law(Revised Draft)

作　　者：李余华[1] 詹传涛 Li Yuhua;Zhan Chuantao(School of Humanities and Social Sciences,East China Jiaotong University,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330013,China)

机构地区：[1]华东交通大学人文社会科学学院,江西南昌330013

出　　处：《河北工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第1期47-54,共8页Journal of Hebei University of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：江西省青年马克思主义者理论研究创新工程(20QM31)。

摘　　要：《行政处罚法(修订草案)》在《行政处罚法》的基础上对听证程序进行了较大的修订。主要包括四点:优化了条文结构;扩宽了听证程序的适用范围;细化了听证程序实施的具体规则;增强了听证笔录对实体决定的影响力。总体看来,《行政处罚法(修订草案)》在听证程序方面的修订具有修订内容全面、以问题意识为导向和注重对当事人程序权利的保障三大特征。但是,此次修法也存在着听证程序适用范围的封闭性、听证程序的启动权主体的单一性、听证程序实施细则的笼统性的问题。针对这些问题,此次修法应当通过采取科学的立法技术、修改不合理的规范内容予以解决,实现听证程序在促进实体决定正确、维护当事人及利害关系人合法权益方面的价值。Based on the Administrative Punishment Law,the Administrative Punishment Law(Revised Draft)has made major revisions to the hearing procedures,including optimizing the structure of the provisions,broadening the scope of application,refining the specific rules of the implementation,and enhancing the influence of the hearing record on the substantive decision.On the whole,the revised version is characterized by comprehensive revision contents,problem-oriented consciousness,and emphasis on the protection of the parties′procedural rights.However,there are also some flaws in the hearing procedure of the amendment,such as the closed application scope,the singularity of the subject of initiation right,and the generality of the implementation rules.In view of these problems,the amendment shall modify unreasonable norms with sound legislative techniques to make hearing procedure better facilitate the correct substantive decisions as well as the legitimate rights and interests of the parties and interested parties concerned.

关 键 词：听证程序 《行政处罚法(修订草案)》 程序正义制 

分 类 号：D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]