再论“击椎生”绝非唐璆而是蔡锷与曾业英先生再商榷  

Further Discussion on the Problem that“Ji Zhui Sheng”Was not Tang Qiu but Cai E:Discussing with Mr.Zeng Yeying Again

作　　者：邓江祁[1] DENG Jiang-qi(Department of Education of Hunan Province,Changsha 410016,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南省教育厅,湖南长沙410016

出　　处：《特立研究》2022年第1期80-88,共9页Teli Research

基　　金：湖南省教育厅科研课题“蔡锷佚文的发掘整理及其价值研究”(编号:13C1177)。

摘　　要：在“击椎生”是谁的问题上,曾业英再次发文,试图对其以前的失误进行辩解,以证明“击椎生”还是唐璆。但经查考,曾业英的辩解大多建立在对史料误读的基础之上,因而其所有的结论全部不能成立。“击椎生”绝非唐璆而是蔡锷。On the question of who is Ji Zhui Sheng,Mr.Zeng Yeying has published a new paper trying to justify his previous mistakes and proved that Ji Zhui Sheng was still Tang Qiu.According to the research,a lot of Mr.Zeng's demonstrations were based on a misreading of the historical records.Therefore,all of his conclusion cannot be established.Ji Zhui Sheng was definitely not Tang Qiu but Cai E.

关 键 词：击椎生 蔡锷 唐璆 曾业英 

分 类 号：K14[历史地理—历史学]