检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁晨晨 LIANG Chenchen(China National Nuclear Corporation,Beijing 100088,China)
出 处:《核科学与工程》2021年第6期1324-1331,共8页Nuclear Science and Engineering
摘 要:就核损害赔偿责任的除外责任,一般而言国际公约及国内法均规定了战争、武装冲突、受害人故意等情形,个别公约提及了巨大自然灾害,然而,鲜有公约或国内法对发生核事故的核设施的边界进行详细探讨,也因此在实践中核设施的场内财产边界划分产生诸多问题。本文旨在通过对国际公约及其磋商文件的分析,为运营者的场内财产除外责任的边界进行探讨,并通过对各国相关国内法的借鉴,为解决实践中的问题提出相应结论和参考。As regard to the excluded liability of the nuclear liability,in general,international conventions and relevant national laws have the scenarios of war,armed conflicts,victim’s intentional act,etc.,only a few scenarios stipulated grave natural disaster.However,there are rare circumstances discussed about the exclusion of the boundary of the operators’on-site property.Following the situation,the practices raised up several problems.This article aimed at analysis of international conventions and their negotiation records,so as to discuss the exclusion of the boundary of the operators’on-site property,and to provide a comparative conclusion and reference to the practice,according to the study on national laws,.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.116.170