新时期以来史剧观的发展、交锋与共存  

The Development, Confrontation and Coexistence of the Views of Chinese Historical Plays since the New Period

作　　者：伏涤修 Fu Dixiu

机构地区：[1]浙江传媒学院

出　　处：《戏剧（中央戏剧学院学报）》2022年第1期91-107,共17页Drama:The Journal of the Central Academy of Drama

基　　金：国家社科基金艺术学重大项目“中国戏曲历史题材创作研究”(项目编号:20ZD23)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：新时期以来,史剧观呈现多元发展、交锋争鸣、共存融合状态。"历史真实论"认为:历史剧应保持历史的真实性,艺术虚构不能违背历史框架和基本历史事实的真实。"历史本质真实论"认为:历史剧不应被历史事实所束缚,历史剧应表现历史本质、历史内在可能性的真实。"历史审美真实论"认为:历史上的人和事不过是剧作家创作选材时的一点因由,历史剧创作追求的应是历史人性、历史情感的审美真实。"非原型历史论"认为:即使没有具体历史原型,也可以写成"历史寓言剧""仿历史剧"。Since the new period, the view of historical play has undergone diversified development, confrontation, coexistence and integration. "The theory of historical truth" holds that historical plays should maintain historical authenticity, and artistic fiction should not violate the historical framework and the truth of basic historical facts. "The theory of historical essence truth" holds that historical plays should show the reality of historical essence and inherent possibility and should not be limited by historical facts. "The theory of historical aesthetic truth"holds that the historical figures and events are no more than factors that affect the playwrights’ decision-making of materials, and that the aesthetic truth of historical humanity and historical emotion should be pursued in the creation of historical play. "Non-archetype historical theory"holds that "historical allegory play" and "parody historical play" can be written even without specific historical archetype.

关 键 词：史剧观 历史真实论 历史本质真实论 历史审美真实论 非原型历史论 

分 类 号：J82[艺术—戏剧戏曲]