论国际公法中禁止反言原则的适用  

Application of Doctrine of Estoppel in Public International Law

作　　者：曾皓[1] ZENG Hao(College of Law, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, Hunan 410081, China)

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学法学院,湖南长沙410081

出　　处：《湘潭大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第2期95-100,共6页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences

基　　金：湖南省社科基金项目“中印边界争端危机管控中的国际法问题研究”(20YBA157);湖南省教育厅项目“‘维持中印边境地区和平与安宁’条约义务问题研究:确立、遵守与执行”(20K076)成果。

摘　　要：国际公法中的禁止反言原则,是将国内法中的禁止反言原则类比适用于国际社会的产物。在国际公法中,禁止反言原则不但是一项国际法中的一般法律原则,还构成国际习惯法规则。但必须谨慎适用这一原则。基于诚信原则与一致性原则,只有一国先前对相关事实做了清楚的陈述,且该国的陈述是自愿的、无条件的、经过授权的,相关声明所针对的国家依赖该声明且作出了损害自身利益的行为,或者作出声明的一方从中获得了某种利益,具有合法期待的国家才能够依据禁止反言原则,要求另一国不得否认其先前对另一方所作事实陈述的真实性。The doctrine of estoppel in public international law is the product of application of the estoppel in domestic law to the international community by analogy.In public international law,the doctrine of estoppel is not only one of the general principles in international law,but also a rule of international customary law.But such a principle must be used with caution.Based on the principle of good faith and the principle of consistency in state relations,only if a state has previously made a clear statement of the relevant facts,that statement is voluntary,unconditional and authorized,the state to which the statement is directed relies on it and has acted against its own interests,or the party making the statement has benefited from it,can the state with legitimate expectations,under the estoppel principle,require another state not to deny the truth of its previous statement of fact to the other party.

关 键 词：禁止反言 国际公法 一般法律原则 国际习惯法 

分 类 号：DF90[政治法律—国际法学]