我国《监察法》实施中的“法法衔接”问题及其应对  

The Problem of"Connection Between Law and Law"in the Application of the Supervision Law of China

作　　者：卢志军 杨宗辉[2] Lu Zhijun;Yang Zonghui

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,武汉430073 [2]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,武汉430073

出　　处：《中州学刊》2022年第3期55-58,共4页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou

摘　　要：2021年出台的《刑事诉讼法》司法解释将监检衔接作为一项重要内容,但对于监察实务如何与检察、审判工作有效衔接,仍存在证据标准不一、程序衔接不明、外部监督缺失等问题。针对该司法解释的不足,应当从细节处进行微观调控,通过明确证据适用标准、建立证据转化机制、完善监察调查活动的外部监督机制,切实解决《监察法》适用中的“法法衔接”难题,实现反腐效益最大化。The judicial interpretation of the Criminal Procedure Law issued in 2021 takes the connection between supervision and prosecution as an important content,but there are still some problems in the effective connection between supervision practice and procuratorial and judicial work,such as different inconsistent standards,unclear procedure connection,and lack of external supervision.In view of the deficiency of the judicial interpretation,we should carry out micro regulation from the details,and effectively solve the problem of"connection between law and law"in the application of the Supervision Law by clarifying the applicable standards of evidence,establishing the evidence transformation mechanism and improving the external supervision mechanism of supervision and investigation activities,so as to maximize the benefits of anti-corruption.

关 键 词：“法法衔接” 证明标准 证据转化 外部监督机制 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]