论钱基博《现代中国文学史》之“体”  

On the Genre of Qian Jibo’s History of Modern Chinese Literature

作　　者：董方伯 谭子玮 DONG Fang-bo;Tan Zi-wei(Department of Chinese language and Literature,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433 China;College of Liberal Arts,Anhui University,HeFei 230039 China)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学中文系,上海200433 [2]安徽大学文学院,合肥230039

出　　处：《湖北工业职业技术学院学报》2022年第1期42-48,共7页Journal of Hubei Industrial Polytechnic

摘　　要：钱基博《现代中国文学史》贯通古今的建构方式学界多有讨论,其著书之“体”实际上是更为基本和具体的研究角度。首先,钱著用两《汉书·儒林传》之“体”,“分经叙次、叙其流别”“明以原委”,加以“长编”“比类”;其次,“铺叙履历”“互见”应看作源自《史记》,而记录轶闻的倾向来自《晋书》;最后,钱著还杂取了《诗品》等诗文评类著作、《明史·文苑传》叙复社、互著法等写作方式。从“体”的角度来看,钱著承认了白话文作为一种“体”的存在,可为一代之文学,因此也就帮助建构了“现代性”,并且表达了新旧文学并无对立的观念。The construction method of Mr. Qian’s History of Modern Chinese Literature through ancient and modern times has been discussed a lot in academic circles, and the genre of his works is actually a more basic and specific research angle. First of all, Mr. Qian used the style of the two Han Shu · biography of Confucianism to narrate the primary and secondary, to describe the genre and fully explain the reasons and as well as “long compilation” and “comparison”;Secondly, “recounting the resume” and “crossing reference” should be regarded as derivation from Historical Records,while the tendency to record anecdotes comes from Jin Shu;Finally, Mr. Qian’s books also mixed with the styles of poetic criticism works Shipin,The History of Ming · Wenyuan,and so on. From the perspective of genre, Mr.Qian acknowledged that vernacular literature is a kind of genre and a generation of literature, so he helped to construct “Modernity” and expressed the idea that there is no contradiction between the old and new literature.

关 键 词：钱基博 现代中国文学史 文体 

分 类 号：I209[文学—中国文学]