基于TOE框架的装备制造业与现代服务业融合组态研究  

Research on Configuration of Integration of Equipment Manufacturing Industry and Modern Service Industry Based on TOE Framework

作　　者：彭永涛[1] 侯彦超 罗建强[1] 李丫丫[2] PENG Yongtao;HOU Yanchao;LUO Jianqiang;LI Yaya(Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang,Jiangsu,China)

机构地区：[1]江苏大学管理学院,江苏省镇江市212013 [2]江苏大学财经学院,江苏省镇江市212013

出　　处：《管理学报》2022年第3期333-341,共9页Chinese Journal of Management

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(71802099);江苏省社会科学基金资助项目(21GLC005);江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究资助重大项目(2020SJZDA062)。

摘　　要：基于技术-组织-环境(TOE)理论框架,构建影响装备制造业与现代服务业融合过程的驱动模型,运用模糊集定性比较分析法(fsQCA),探究我国大陆地区30个省市装备制造业与现代服务业融合组态之间的因果关系,刻画装备制造业与现代服务业融合路径,并以此为基础进一步探究组态条件之间的互补替代关系。研究表明:存在均衡发展型、服务主导型、制造主导型和政府驱动型4条高融合水平路径,其中均衡发展型路径在实现融合过程中作用最为明显;技术创新与扩散、政府政策与制度是实现融合的关键性因素;数字化技术和产业竞争强度、服务经济水平、政府政策与制度各因素间存在互补或替代关系。Based on the Technology-Organization-Environment(TOE),this study builds the equipment manufacturing industry and modern service industry convergence process driven model,and uses the fuzzy qualitative comparison analysis(fsQCA) method to explore the causality relationship of configuration of integration between equipment manufacturing industry and modern service industry in 30 provinces and cities in China's Mainland.On this basis,the complementary substitution relationship between configuration conditions is further explored.The results show that there are four paths with high integration level:balanced development path,service-oriented path,manufacturing-oriented path and government-driven path.The balanced development path plays the most significant role in the integration process.Technological innovation and diffusion,government policies and institutions are the key factors to achieve integration.Digital technology and industrial competition intensity,the level of service economy,government policy and system of various factors have complementary or substitute relations.

关 键 词：装备制造业 现代服务业 融合路径 定性比较分析法 

分 类 号：C93[经济管理—管理学]