检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]杭州师范大学外国语学院
出 处:《广东外语外贸大学学报》2022年第2期53-64,158,共13页Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
摘 要:作为18世纪初著名的文学期刊,《旁观者》的出版在当时备受瞩目。近年来,不断有学者强调《旁观者》在塑造理智且独立女性形象时的客观立场。这不免与伍尔夫的观点相对。后者认为《旁观者》的立场虽看似客观,却有违性别公正,其旁观者本质上是"男性旁观者"。本文指出,虽然我们无法忽略《旁观者》在构建女性阅读史和理想女性读者方面的贡献,但同样不可否认的是,它试图通过引导女性阅读将女性禁锢在私人领域之内。上述矛盾背后,18世纪女性阅读引发的性别焦虑不言自明。As a famous literary periodical in the early 18;century,the publication of The Spectator attracted much attention at that time.In recent years,some scholars have pointed out that The Spectator has created a series of rational and independent female images from a relatively objective perspective.This is in contrast to Virginia Woolf’s view.The latter believed that even if the position of the periodical seemed objective,gender inequality still existed because the spectator there was a“male spectator”.This paper attempts to argue that although we cannot ignore the contribution of The Spectator in constructing the history of female reading and the image of ideal female readers,it is also undeniable that it tried to confine women to the private sphere by guiding their readings.Behind such a contradiction,the gender anxiety caused by the female reading in the18;century is self-evident.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49