作为论争的“话题”:20世纪30年代“周作人”经典化构建考察  

The“Topic”of Debate:A Survey of the Canonization of“Zhou Zuoren”in the 1930s

作　　者：姚玳玫[1] YAO Dai-mei(College of Chinese Language and Literature,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510631,China)

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学文学院,广东广州510631

出　　处：《海南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第1期30-40,共11页Journal of Hainan Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“中国新文学评价体系建构实践研究(1928—1937)”(12BZW108)。

摘　　要：20世纪30年代上半叶,周作人作为“小品文第一人”的经典性地位基本确立。这个过程含有自我阐释与他者论述双向推进的迹象。1929年之后,苦雨斋师生闭门聚合,惺惺相惜,以序跋书信互为唱和,开始他们闲适的个人主义文学的自我阐释历程。在这个过程中,“周作人”被悄然推出。1930年以后关于周作人的论述热潮到来,周作人作为自由主义作家的代表,引人注目,成为各路文化人论争的“话题”——被讨论,被甄定,被责难或被赞美。在受指责与受推崇的平分秋色中,周作人成为一座不可绕过的山,其权威性在这场文化论辩中确立。In the first half of the 1930s,Zhou Zuoren’s classical status as the first person in essay writing was basically established.This process contains signs of a two-way progression of self-interpretation and narrative from others.After 1929,Zhou Zuoren and his students gathered together behind closed doors in the name of Ku Yu Zhai,sympathizing with and praising each other through meeting and letter-writing,etc,thereby having commenced their self-interpretation of leisurely individualistic literature,during which“Zhou Zuoren”was introduced quietly.The upsurge of discussions on Zhou Zuoren emerged after 1930,and Zhou Zuoren,as a representative of liberal writers,has attracted much attention and become a“topic”of debate among scholars of various cultural backgrounds in that he has been constantly discussed,evaluated,praised or condemned.In this cultural debate,the authority of Zhou Zuoren,like an inescapable mountain in the midst of equal blame and praise dichotomy,is established.

关 键 词：“周作人” 自我阐释 辩论的效应 经典化构建 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]