检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李牧翰 LI Muhan(Law school,Hunan University,Changsha 410000,China)
出 处:《大连理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第2期81-87,共7页Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“互联网时代第三方支付风险治理法律问题研究”(16AFX018)。
摘 要:数字主体权利保护是提升公众数字参与程度、促进数字经济健康发展的必要法律措施。然而,现行数字主体保护制度难以应对算法领域的权利侵害现象,数字主体仍暴露于算法侵权的风险之中。算法侵权归因于算法控制者的自身利益最大化目标以及在科技与经济方面的社会优势地位,其以算法歧视侵蚀数据主体平等,以算法自动关联暴露数据主体隐私信息,以算法自动决策压缩数据主体意思自治空间。立足于技术中立的基准,正视科技与法律之间的互动关系,建构数字时代算法侵权规制体系,强化算法规制理念,建立数据保护官制度,完善个人权利配置。Protecting the rights of digital subject is an indispensable legal measure to promote public digital participation and healthy development of digital economy.Current legal institutions concerning digital user protection,however,are insufficient in dealing with infringements arising in algorithmic procedures,thus exposing digital users to the risk of algorithmic infringements.Algorithmic infringements result from algorithm controllers’motivation for maximizing self-interest and taking advantage of the social benefits in both technological and economic terms.Such infringements take the form of algorithmic discrimination eroding inter-user equality,automatic correlation disclosing digital subject’s privacy,and automated algorithmic decision reducing digital subject’s free will.In consideration of technological neutrality,the interrelationship between law and technology should be reformulated,the regulation of algorithmic infringements should be implemented in the era of digital economy.Accordingly,the idea of algorithmic-centered regulation can be reinforced,data protection officer put in place and allocation of personal digital rights improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170