仲裁法中的强制性和任意性规则  

Mandatory Provisions and Default Provisions in Arbitration Law

作　　者：廖鸣 Liao Ming

机构地区：[1]泰和泰(北京)律师事务所 [2]北京仲裁委员会/北京国际仲裁中心

出　　处：《北京仲裁》2021年第3期63-79,共17页Beijing Arbitration Quarterly

摘　　要：仲裁法中的规定是强制性还是任意性规则?仲裁委员会的仲裁规则是否可以作出不同于仲裁法规范的规定?当事人订立的仲裁协议或者仲裁条款有多大程度的意思自治空间?本文以强行法、任意法区分的理论为出发点,以现行《中华人民共和国仲裁法》规定为基础,从规范用语及司法实践层面解读其中强制性和任意性规范,并以英国1996年《仲裁法》关于强制性规范规则进行比较法的分析,对在我国仲裁法下进行强制性和任意性规范区分提出建议。这也是2021年7月底司法部公布的《中华人民共和国仲裁法(修订)(征求意见稿)》的修法方向之一。Are the provisions in the arbitration law mandatory or arbitrary?To what extent can arbitration rules of Arbitration Commissions make provisions different from those of the Arbitration Law?To what extent does the arbitration agreement or arbitration clause concluded by the parties have autonomy of will?Based on the theory of the distinction between mandatory law and arbitrary law,and based on the provisions of the current Arbitration Law,this article interprets the mandatory and arbitrary norms in the Law from the aspects of normative language and judicial practice,and makes a comparative analysis of the mandatory rules in the English Arbitration Law 1996.Above that,this article puts forward some suggestions on the distinction between mandatory and arbitrary provisions under China’s Arbitration Law.This is also one of the development directions of the draft amending version for Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China published by the Ministry of justice at the end of July 2021.

关 键 词：仲裁法 仲裁规则 强制性规则 任意性规则 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]