结合马来西亚新案例看国际工程索赔程序条款效力问题——基于比较法的视角  

Comparative Study on the Validity of Procedural Requirement on Claims in Overseas Projects Contracting and Engineering in Light of Malaysian New Case Law

作　　者：李佳 Li Jia

机构地区：[1]上海中建海外发展有限公司

出　　处：《北京仲裁》2021年第3期138-152,共15页Beijing Arbitration Quarterly

摘　　要：工程索赔作为工程管理的核心之一,其成功与否对国际承包商具有重要意义,但目前各个国家或法域对索赔程序条款的效力认定均不相同,司法实践也存在差异。本文作者从比较法的视角,结合马来西亚最近的案例法,从法律渊源和司法实践等维度分析和比较中国与马来西亚法域对索赔程序条款效力和程序瑕疵失权问题的不同观点,以期引起中国承包商对索赔问题的关注,从而加深对索赔程序性要求的重视,深入树立契约至上的理念,加强国际工程的索赔管理工作。The success of claims in overseas project contracting and engineering is of key importance to each and every international project contractor.However,the opinions on the validity of procedural requirement on claims vary from one country or territorial legal unit to another.The author of this paper conducts a comparative legal study on the legal sources and legal practice between China and Malaysia.On the basis of this comparative study,this paper attempts to attract more attention of international project contractors to claim management and help develop the spirit of contract.

关 键 词：索赔程序要求 程序瑕疵 索赔程序条款效力 中国 马来西亚 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]