检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄培云 HUANG Pei-yun(Guangdong Fire and Rescue Brigade,Guangdong Guang-zhou 510640,China)
机构地区:[1]广东省消防救援总队法制与社会消防工作处,广东广州510640
出 处:《消防科学与技术》2022年第4期566-568,共3页Fire Science and Technology
摘 要:一直以来,关于行政执法中的过错归责原则,在国内外学界都有不同的认识,且在各国的法律规定中均有不同的体现。新修订的《中华人民共和国行政处罚法》有关主观过错归责相关条文规定提出后,消防监督执法作为行政执法类型之一,对消防行政处罚案件的事实认定、法律适用、证据采集应用等方面产生一定影响。本文针对这些情况和问题,结合工作实际,开展对策性研讨并提出相应工作建议。For a long time, there are some different understandings about the fault imputation principle in administrative law enforcement in the academic circles at home and abroad, and it is reflected differently in the legal provisions of various countries including our country. As one of the types of administrative law enforcement, the fire law enforcement will also have some significant impact on the fact determination, law application and evidence collection and application of fire administrative penalty cases after the new provisions on subjective fault attribution in the Administrative Punishment Law of the People’s Republic of China are put forward. In view of these situations and problems, combined with the actual work, this paper discusses countermeasures and puts forward corresponding suggestions.
分 类 号:X921[环境科学与工程—安全科学] TU998.1[建筑科学—市政工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49