检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐俊麒 TANG Jun-qi(Guanghua Law School of Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310008)
出 处:《行政法学研究》2022年第2期153-165,共13页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
基 金:国家社科基金课题“政府数据的权益配置与利用保障研究”(项目编号:19BFX027);浙江省哲学社会科学规划“地方立法”专项课题“‘最多跑一次’改革立法相关问题研究”(项目编号:18DFLF01YB)。
摘 要:“放管服”改革中,为提高行政审批效率,政府关注对行政审批模式的创新。审批流程的重构改变了多阶段行政行为的行为间关系,违法性继承的适用也将展现出新的面向。传统的“例外承认规则”已不再贴合行政实践,司法有必要对审批流程作“一体性考量”:在行为间成立法定要件关系,表现出实体上的关联性时,只要先行行政行为存在瑕疵,基于改革“一体化”审批的思路,为充分保护当事人权利,法院可以此否认后续行政行为的合法性。In the reform of“Decentralization-Management-Service”,the government pays attention to the innovation of administrative examination and approval mode for improving the efficiency of administrative examination and approval.The reconstruction of examination and approval process has changed the relationship between multi-stage administrative acts,and the phenomenon of the Inheritance of the Illegality will show a new face.The traditional rules of recognition under exceptions is no longer suitable for administrative practice,so it is necessary for the judiciary to consider the approval process as a whole:when the legal relationship between acts is established and the substantive relevance is shown,as long as the prior administrative act has defects,based on the idea of reforming the“integration”approval,in order to fully protect the rights of the parties,the court can judge the subsequent administrative act illegal.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222