我国行政复议体制改革的发展演进、目标构成及修法回应  

The Evolution, Objectives and Response to Amendment of Reform of Administrative Reconsideration System

作　　者：曹鎏 李月 Cao Liu;Li Yue

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法治政府研究院 [2]中国政法大学法学院

出　　处：《行政管理改革》2022年第4期37-50,共14页Administration Reform

摘　　要：我国行政复议体制改革历经酝酿期、试点期及全面推进期三个阶段。以相对集中行政复议体制和行政复议委员会为核心的改革路径在地方全面铺开。有效解决职责配置分散等制约行政复议良性发展的深层次体制机制问题,充分发挥行政复议实质性化解行政争议优势,是本次体制改革的直接动因。从地方改革的年度进展来看,相对集中复议体制、行政复议委员会、信息化规范化专业化改革整体推进,同时也体现出一定的区域差异。在行政复议法修订的关键时期,实现法治为改革护航之目标需要从价值理念、目标方向、内容举措等维度予以充分回应。The reform of administrative reconsideration system has gone through three stages: the gestation period, the pilot period and the comprehensive promotion period. 2020 is an important period for the reform of the local administrative reconsideration system. The reforms centered on the relatively concentrated system of administrative reconsideration and the administrative reconsideration committee have been rolled out nationwide. Direct motives of the reforms are that effectively addressing the dispersedresponsibilities and other in-depth problems which restrict the good development of administrative reconsideration, and giving full play to the advantages of administrative reconsideration in resolving administrative disputes substantively.From the perspective of the annual reform progress, these reforms, the relatively concentrated system of administrative reconsideration, the administrative reconsideration committee, the reforms of informatization,normalization and specialization, have been promoted comprehensively. Meanwhile, all of the reforms reflect regional differences. The Administrative Reconsideration Law is being revised. In the critical period, it’s necessary to make a full response to the reforms of value, target and measure in the revision of the law.

关 键 词：相对集中行政复议体制 行政复议委员会 主渠道 实质性化解争议 

分 类 号：D63[政治法律—政治学]