检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏小来 Wei Xiaolai
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨市道里区人民法院,黑龙江哈尔滨150000
出 处:《南海法学》2022年第2期55-65,共11页The South China Sea Law Journal
摘 要:裁判文书说理是彰显司法精神、坚持司法为民、保证司法公正的重要方式,通过在中国裁判文书网选取典型案例进行实证研究下的定性和定量分析,确定了裁判文书法律适用和自由裁量说理对司法公信力的重要意义,故以裁判法律思维、现实社会的民意舆论以及域外实践为研究范式对法律适用和自由裁量的说理作出法律推理论证、法律漏洞填补、裁判价值补充等实践评价和现状的追根溯源,进而得出司法裁判中法律适用和自由裁量说理效能提升路径的构造应当以社会法学的利益衡平、法律工具价值等理论为指引。Judicial document reasoning is an important way to highlight the judicial spirit,adhere to justice for the people and ensure judicial justice.Through the qualitative and quantitative analysis of typical cases selected from China judicial document network for empirical research,this paper determines the significance of legal application of judicial documents and discretionary reasoning to judicial credibility public opinion in the real society and extraterrito⁃rial practice are the research paradigm to make practical evaluation and trace the source of the current situation,such as legal reasoning and demonstration,filling of legal loopholes,supplement of judicial value,etc.For the rea⁃soning of legal application and discretion,the research results show that the construction of the path to improve the efficiency of legal application and discretion in judicial judgment should be based on the balance of the interests of social law guided by the theory of legal tool value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117