机构地区:[1]湖南中医药高等专科学校附属第一医院(湖南省中医医院)功能科,湖南株洲421000
出 处:《心血管康复医学杂志》2022年第2期199-203,共5页Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨超声心动图描记术对LVEF正常的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者左心功能和心室重构的研究价值。方法:选择2019年4月-2020年4月首次于我院进行透析治疗的LVEF正常的ESRD患者共104例作为ESRD组;同时选择年龄、性别匹配的50例健康体检者为健康对照组。采用超声心动图检测,比较两组心室收缩、舒张功能指标,Tei指数及血清N末端B型钠尿肽(NT-proBNP)、转化生长因子(TGF)-β1水平。结果:与健康对照组比较,ESRD组左室舒张末容积(LVEDV)[(102.68±9.73)ml比(118.28±29.01)ml]、左室收缩末容积(LVESV)[(33.06±4.71)ml比(41.09±12.88)ml]、左室整体舒张末容积(gLVEDV)[(74.87±10.13)ml比(93.70±11.51)ml]、左室整体收缩末容积(gLVESV)[(27.23±5.31)ml比(43.92±13.83)ml]、E[(69.78±17.36)cm/s比(81.16±23.97)cm/s]、A[(68.49±24.73)cm/s比(87.44±20.68)cm/s]、A’[(9.27±3.11)cm/s比(10.58±2.84)cm/s]、血清NT-proBNP[(158.60±31.49)pg/ml比(2838.09±650.88)pg/ml]、TGF-β1[(8.74±4.33)μg/L比(42.75±6.77)μg/L]水平和Tei指数[(0.36±0.04)比(0.42±0.12)]均显著升高,LVEF[(67.73±4.19)%比(62.55±5.41)%]、左室整体射血分数(gLVEF)[(64.22±3.80)%比(56.18±5.11)%]、E/A[(1.48±0.82)比(0.86±0.41)]、E’[(11.08±2.54)cm/s比(6.98±2.07)cm/s]、E’/A’[(1.16±0.81)比(0.71±0.23)]均显著降低,P均=0.001。结论:LVEF正常的ESRD患者存在左心室重构及功能减退,临床应重视此类患者的左心室重构及功能的全面评估。Objective:To explore value of echocardiography(ECG)on left heart function and ventricular remodeling in patients with end stage renal disease(ESRD)and normal LVEF.Methods:A total of 104 ESRD patients with normal LVEF,who received first dialysis therapy in our hospital from Apr 2019 to Apr 2020,were regarded as ESRD group;another 50 healthy subjects with corresponding age and gender were treated as healthy control group.Heart function was measured by ECG,ventricular systolic and diastolic function indexes,Tei index,serum levels of N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide(NT-proBNP),transforming growth factor(TGF)β1 were compared between two groups.Results:Compared with healthy control group,there were significant rise in left ventricular end-diastolic volume(LVEDV)[(102.68±9.73)ml vs.(118.28±29.01)ml],left ventricular end-systolic volume(LVESV)[(33.06±4.71)ml vs.(41.09±12.88)ml],general LVEDV(gLVEDV)[(74.87±10.13)ml vs.(93.70±11.51)ml],general LVESV(gLVESV)[(27.23±5.31)ml vs.(43.92±13.83)ml],E[(69.78±17.36)cm/s vs.(81.16±23.97)cm/s],A[(68.49±24.73)cm/s vs.(87.44±20.68)cm/s],A’[(9.27±3.11)cm/s vs.(10.58±2.84)cm/s],serum levels of NT-proBNP[(158.60±31.49)pg/ml vs.(2838.09±650.88)pg/ml],TGF-β1[(8.74±4.33)μg/L vs.(42.75±6.77)μg/L]and Tei index[(0.36±0.04)vs.(0.42±0.12)],and significant reductions in LVEF[(67.73±4.19)%vs.(62.55±5.41)%],general LVEF(gLVEF)[(64.22±3.80)%vs.(56.18±5.11)%],E/A[(1.48±0.82)vs.(0.86±0.41)],E’[(11.08±2.54)cm/s vs.(6.98±2.07)cm/s]and E’/A’[(1.16±0.81)vs.(0.71±0.23)]in ESRD group,P=0.001 all.Conclusion:Left ventricular remodeling and functional decline exist in ESRD patients with normal LVEF.Attention should be paid to left ventricular remodeling and comprehensive function assessment in these patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...