检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何敏[1] 马诗雅 He Min;Ma Shiya(School of Intellectual Property,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出 处:《科技与法律(中英文)》2022年第2期54-62,共9页Science Technology and Law(Chinese-English Version)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“驱动知识产权强国战略的职务发明制度研究”(16ZDA076)。
摘 要:随着数字经济时代的到来,我国互联网企业间数据竞争纠纷频繁发生。《反不正当竞争法》中一般条款的适用在解决数据纠纷中发挥了较为积极的作用。法院在适用《反不正当竞争法》一般条款解决互联网企业数据竞争纠纷案件中缺乏体系化的逻辑结构。一般条款的适用存在其内化的逻辑结构:首先,应当以不属于《反不正当竞争法》中明确列举的行为作为逻辑前提;其次,应以“四要素”作为适用一般条款的逻辑主线;再次,将比例原则作为逻辑关联,辅助判断涉案竞争行为的性质;最后,在上述判断基础上推导出逻辑结论。With the advent of the digital economy era, data competition disputes among internet enterprises in China occur frequently. The application of the general provisions in the Anti-Unfair Competition Law has played a positive role in solving data disputes. The court lacks a systematic logical structure in applying the general provisions of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law to solve the data competition disputes of internet enterprises. The application of general clauses has its internalized logical structure: firstly, it should take the acts that do not belong to the acts explicitly listed in the Anti-Unfair Competition Law as the logical premise;secondly, "four elements" should be taken as the logical main line of the application of general terms;thirdly, the principle of proportionality should be used as a logical connection to assist in judging the nature of the competition behavior involved;finally, the logical conclusion is derived based on the above judgment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117