新文科背景下语言界面研究瓶颈的解决路径  

The Bottleneck of Linguistic Interface Study and Its Way out in the Context of New Liberal Arts

作　　者：张延飞[1] 刘洪东[1] ZHANG Yanfei;LIU Hongdon

机构地区：[1]山东大学,济南250100

出　　处：《当代外语研究》2022年第1期103-110,152,共9页Contemporary Foreign Language Studies

基　　金：山东大学齐鲁青年学者资助项目和山东省本科教学改革研究项目“新文科背景下多学科交叉融合的国际组织人才培养模式探索与实践”(编号M2020275)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：近20年来,基于语用学发展而来的语言界面研究取得了长足的发展,但是语义-语用界面论和语境决定论的理论分歧使语言界面研究陷入瓶颈。本文根据"新文科"要求提出了新型语言界面观,为瓶颈的解决提供了新的路径。"语言学+哲学"的交叉了通过引入唯物辩证法可以摆脱"以偏概全"的语言哲学思潮,据此本文提出规约和语境是对立统一体,基于规约和语境制衡的关系,默认意义分为结构默认、社会文化默认和情景默认,这三种默认意义的语境依赖程度依次增强。"语言学+计算科学"和"语言学+实验科学"的交叉可验证"语言学+哲学"的交叉研究提出的理论假设,这一研究方法为构建本土化语用学提供了学科交叉的新方向。In the past two decades,linguistic interface study informed by pragmatics has made great progress,but,due to the theoretical controversies between the semantics-pragmatics interface view and the context-determined view,it has hit a bottleneck.This article proposes a new linguistic interface view in the context of New Liberal Arts,which provides a way out.By introducing materialist dialectics,the cross-disciplinary research between linguistics and philosophy undoes the view of“taking a part for the whole”in the Western thought and proposes that convention and context are the unity of opposites,based on which default meaning is divided into structural default,socio-cultural default and situational default,and their context-dependence degrees increase in turn.“Linguistics+Computational Science”and“Linguistics+Experimental Science”deploy Chinese facts to verify“Linguistics+Philosophy”,facilitating the localization of pragmatics incorporating Chinese elements.

关 键 词：语言界面 新文科 默认意义 语境 规约 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学]