论剩余价值来源问题上的哥白尼式革命  

On the Copernican Revolution in the Problem of the Source of Surplus Value

作　　者：李坤钰 Li Kunyu

机构地区：[1]吉林大学哲学社会学院

出　　处：《马克思主义哲学研究》2021年第2期162-169,共8页Marxist Philosophical Research

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“文明形态变革的哲学理念创新”(项目编号:18ZDA015)

摘　　要：剩余价值的来源领域问题是马克思政治经济学批判的重要议题。马克思明确地指出,重农学派把关于剩余价值起源的研究从流通领域转向直接生产领域,这样就为分析资本主义生产奠定了基础。思考重农学派“转向”这一理论过程本身的论述,就是要在“面向事情本身”的意义上对构成“转向”的基本思想前提、基本思想内容以及基本思想意义进行追问。只有这样,才能澄清重农学派与以往经济思想家们的根本性区别,进而理解剩余价值概念的历史性成因。The question of the field of origin of surplus value is an important topic of Marx’s critique of political economy.Marx explicitly pointed out that the Physiocrat school shifted the study of the origin of surplus value from the field of circulation to the field of direct production,thus laying the foundation for the analysis of capitalist production.To consider the theoretical process of the"turn"of the Physiocrat school itself is to inquire into the basic ideological premises,the basic ideological content and the basic ideological significance of the“turn”in the sense of"acing the matter itself".In this way,we can clarify the fundamental ideological premise,content,and meaning of the"turn".Only in this way can we clarify the fundamental differences between the physiocratic school and the previous economic thinkers,and then understand the historical causes of the concept of surplus value.

关 键 词：“剩余价值来源问题” 重商主义 重农学派 生产领域 流通领域 

分 类 号：F091.91[经济管理—政治经济学]