检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于雯雯[1] Yu Wenwen
机构地区:[1]北京市社会科学院法治研究所
出 处:《中国社会科学院大学学报》2022年第2期89-100,146,147,共14页Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
摘 要:随着算力、数据和算法的不断改进,人工智能的智能性不断增强。当人类的参与和控制逐渐减弱,开始辅助机器创作或者完全由机器自主创作时,经由人的意志决定性的解释方法将难以在既有法律框架下完成权益归属。从维护著作权法在“激励自然人创作”方面的价值取向和基本概念体系,促进人工智能产业健康发展及保护自然人创作者的合法权益角度分析,人工智能生成内容宜采用非赋权模式,以作为知识公有领域的组成部分。With the continuous improvement of computing power,data and algorithm,the intelligence of artificial intelligence( AI) is increasing. When human participation and control gradually weaken, or as they begin to assist machine creation or allow machines to create on their own, it is difficult to determine the ownership of rights and interests under the existing legal framework through the decisive interpretation of human will. From the perspective of safeguarding the value orientation and basic concept system of copyright law in“encouraging natural-person creation”,promoting the sound development of AI industry and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of natural-person creators,the non-empowerment model should be applied to AI-generated content as part of the public domain of knowledge.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222