检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邹初妤 韩娜[1] Zou Chuyu;Han Na(School of National Security,People’s Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038)
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学国家安全学院网络空间国际治理研究基地,北京100038
出 处:《智库理论与实践》2022年第2期106-115,共10页Think Tank:Theory & Practice
基 金:国家社科基金项目“国家安全视域下计算宣传的信息操纵及风险防范机制研究”(项目编号:21BXW066)成果之一。
摘 要:[目的/意义]解析智库话语背后的主题演进,探究兰德公司对我国的研究规律,引导我国智库建构,为化解西方智库舆论压力提供解决方向。[方法/过程]本文运用Java代码定位爬取兰德公司涉华文本形成数据库,将数据库导入VOSviewer进行关键词、主题聚类等可视化分析,进而探究兰德公司涉华话语主题。[结果/结论]兰德公司涉华话语负面态度趋势明显,涉华议题着重聚焦于军事、政治、外交主题框架,并在该框架下形成特定涉华安全语境。我国应当注重同国际智库的交流,完善智库管理机制,揭示智库权力逻辑,加强国际舆论引导。[Purpose/significance]This paper aims to analyze the evolution of themes behind the discourse of think tanks,explore the research rules of RAND Corporation in our country,guide the construction of think tanks in our country,and provide direction for defusing the public opinion pressure of western think tanks.[Method/process]This paper uses Java code to locate and crawl the Chinese-related texts of RAND Corporation to form a database,imports the database into VOS viewer for visual analysis of keywords,topic clustering,etc.,and then explores the themes of RAND’s China-related discourse.[Result/conclusion]The research finds that the trend of negative attitudes toward China-related discourse of RAND Corporation is obvious;China-related issues focus on the framework of military,political and diplomatic themes;the specific China-related security context forms under this framework.Our country should focus on coordinating with international think tanks’exchanges,improve the management mechanism of think tanks,reveal the logic of think tank power,and strengthen the guidance of inter-national public opinion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.211.44