检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柯金妍 朱应平[1] KE Jin-yan;ZHU Ying-ping(East China University of Political Science and Law)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海200050
出 处:《哈尔滨学院学报》2022年第4期68-71,共4页Journal of Harbin University
摘 要:《2020年非上海生源应届普通高校毕业生进沪就业申请本市户籍评分办法》为特定高校的应届本科毕业生、硕士毕业生开放了直接落户上海的“绿色通道”。在此背景下,文章从上海落户新政中蕴含的平等权角度切入,从差别的合理性、隔离与合理分类两个角度,探究“绿色通道”政策是否符合宪法中的平等原则,是否对其他高校应届毕业生的基本权利构成了侵犯,并借鉴德国和美国的宪法实践经验,为改善我国实践中存在的落户不平等问题提供建议与思路。“Grading Policy for the Application for registered residence registration of Non-Shanghai Fresh Graduates of Ordinary Universities for Employment in Shanghai in 2020” has opened a “green channel” for fresh undergraduate and master graduates from specific universities to settle directly in Shanghai.From the perspective of the “equal rights” contained in the constitution of Germany and America,this paper explores whether it is in line with the two basic principles of “separation” and whether it is reasonable to use for reference from the perspective of “the right to settle down in Shanghai”.It hopes to provide suggestions and ideas for improving the problem of settlement inequality in China’s practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38