检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王超[1] 马铭 张伟然 许海云 朱世伟 于俊凤 Wang Chao;Ma Ming;Zhang Weiran;Xu Haiyun;Zhu Shiwei;Yu Junfeng(Institute of Information Research, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences);Institute of Science and Technology for Development of Shandong, Qilu University of Technology(Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China;Business School, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000,China)
机构地区:[1]齐鲁工业大学(山东省科学院)情报研究所 [2]齐鲁工业大学(山东省科学院)科技发展战略研究所,山东济南250014 [3]山东理工大学管理学院,山东淄博255000
出 处:《科技进步与对策》2022年第8期19-29,共11页Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(19CTQ028)。
摘 要:关注颠覆性技术创新方向演变对于构建颠覆性技术“发现—遴选—培养”机制,挖掘重大颠覆性技术选题具有重要意义。利用三螺旋协同性测度模型量化政府、产业、学术界3类主体对颠覆性技术关注方向的协同程度,构建颠覆性技术行动者网络,利用社会网络分析法解析网络结构形式下政、产、学三方关注颠覆性技术创新的耦合方向,探究高度耦合技术方向的演化特点。最后,获得技术关注方向协同性、技术关注耦合方向特征、技术关注方向耦合时间时序特征、技术关注方向耦合机构特征、高度耦合技术方向演化特征5个方面的结论。Focusing on the"14th Five-Year Plan"and the outline of the long-term goals for 2035,China has actively carried out the forward-looking layout of disruptive technologies and seized the initiative in scientific and technological development.The diffusion process in the development of technological innovation involves various institutions or organizations,and the innovation system presents complex characteristics such as diversification of subjects and dynamic integration.In this context,to achieve disruptive innovation,it is inseparable from a collaborative innovation ecosystem in which all parties(the government,industry,and universities)work together to participate.The research on the evolution of disruptive technology innovation can effectively guide various domestic innovation entities to participate in the forward-looking layout and innovation of disruptive technology,and explore the establishment of a disruptive technology discovery-selection funding mechanism.It’s supportive for production,academia and research entities to actively explore the"discovery-selection-cultivation"mechanism of disruptive technologies and discover major disruptive technologies.This paper adopts a large-scale research on disruptive technologies,and attempts to analyze the evolution of disruptive technologies by combining quantitative analysis of triple helix synergy with social network analysis.The triple Helix innovation theory is often used to describe the collaborative innovation relationship between government-industry-university,providing a research paradigm to analyze the interaction between government,industry,and universities in the process of innovation.The triple Helix model has an effective synergy measurement model to quantitatively analyze the degree of collaborative innovation among the government,industry,and universities,so as to analyze the consistency of the government,industry,and academia's attention to disruptive technologies from a macro level evolution characteristics.On the other hand,Actor Network Theory(A
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171